Thought for the Day:
“Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had. Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What are relevant are reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”
― Michael Crichton
Birthdays:
1791 Jan Václav Voříšek: Sonata quasi una fantasia b-moll op.20
1888 Irving Berlin: Putting on the Ritz
1823 Alfred Stevens
1824 Jean-Léon Gérôme
1854 Ottmar Mergenthaler
1930 Edsger Dijkstra
1946 Robert Jarvik
MISCELLANY:
FOCUSED PROTECTION: The Great Barrington Declaration
SCIENCE, ETHICS, AND THE NUREMBERG CODE: Declaration of Canadian Physicians for Science and Truth
RELATED: Collateral Global
Leave a comment